Massachusetts Pro-Casino Referendum Takes the Day

Massachusetts Pro-Casino Referendum Takes the Day

Ah, sweet victory: Steve Wynn’s Everett, Massachusetts casino can finally progress after having a referendum vote supporting casinos passed away night that is last.

Residents of Massachusetts have plumped for to uphold the state’s three-year-old casino law, voting overwhelmingly in yesterday’s midterms in favor of maintaining the fledgling casino market, due to the fact polls had predicted.

Somewhat confusingly, ‘no’ meant ‘yes’ for casinos on this ballot, as voters were asked or perhaps a statutory legislation should be repealed, with 59.5 percent to 40.5 percent deciding that no, it should never be repealed, meaning that yes, they desired casinos.

Some commentators have actually recommended that the language used in posing the relevant question was deliberately muddled and created to confuse.

Nonetheless, it’s a victory for MGM and Wynn Resorts, who may have had their respective tasks given the greenlight by regulators and who can now finally and definitely move forward with the certification process, a privilege for which they will fork out $85 million a bit before a cornerstone that is single laid.

Not surprisingly, casino executives were jubilant and anxious to emphasize what the casinos will do for their future communities.

‘Voters across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts today voiced their support of the 10,000 permanent job opportunities and significant financial benefits supplied by the Gaming Act of 2011,’ said pleased MGM Chairman and CEO Jim Murren. ‘MGM Resorts International would like to thank the thousands of volunteers and supporters who understood what is at stake and worked so hard to bring this historic opportunity to realization we can now start the task of rebuilding a great downtown, and igniting a renaissance in Western Massachusetts. for themselves and their neighbors …’

The Next Big Step

MGM now plans to create an $800 million casino resort on a plot that is 14.5-acre downtown Springfield, with construction likely to begin within the spring and a planned opening in the summertime of 2017.

Wynn Resorts, meanwhile, which fought a protracted bidding war with Mohegan Sun for the best to apply for the only real east Massachusetts license, the right it was granted just in early September, will get ahead featuring its plans to build a $1.6 billion casino for a contaminated former chemical plant in Everett, north of Boston. Wynn will pay millions to possess the site cleaned up and decontaminated before construction ensues.

‘While it happens to be a long process, the benefits to everybody in the Commonwealth will be worth it,’ said Wynn Resorts Senior Vice President Robert DeSalvio.

Never in Doubt?

The license that is third secured earlier in the day within the year by Penn National Gaming, which quickly moved ahead with its intends to expand Plainridge Park harness racetrack as a slots parlor, despite knowing there clearly was a chance that the bill could possibly be repealed.

‘It’s a risk, nonetheless it’s a calculated risk,’ said Jay Snowden, Penn National’s chief operating officer, many months straight back. ‘We’re confident we’ll prevail in November.’

And he had been right, nevertheless the issue had been perhaps hardly ever really in doubt. While the Repeal the Deal contingent was vocal, it lacked the funding of its powerful opponents, and the pro-casino vote had led regularly in the polls.

Based on recent campaign finance reports, ‘no’ (meaning yes) vote campaigners had raised nearly $12 million, most of it donated by casino businesses, while the ‘yes’ meaning no vote was in a position to raise simply $675,000.

MGM donated $2.5 million and Wynn Resorts $1 million, while Penn National topped the bill with $3.2 million. This was the reason that the effort that is pro-casino in a position to spend $2 million on casino marketing in October alone, at an occasion when its opponents had been a declaring a balance of $30,000 and debts of $400,000.

Nationwide Election Results May Affect US Online Gambling

Supporters of a Wynn casino in Everett celebrated the defeat of a casino repeal effort in Massachusetts. (Image: Barry Chin/Globe Staff)

Election Day 2014 did not feature a referendum on Internet gambling, nor did anything earth-shattering occur that will forever replace the gaming landscape in the usa.

Still, there were number of local results that were of interest to people who care about gambling issues, and one overarching storyline which could shape the movement associated with debate over online gambling for the following two years.

That big story, as you may have guessed, was the Republican takeover of the Senate.

While benefits (including a runoff election and a decision by Independent Senator Angus King on which party to caucus with) will not be known for some time, the GOP has clinched at the very least 52 seats within the Senate, one significantly more than ended up being required in order to just take the majority.

Republican Majority and Online Poker

The Republican majorities in both houses are worth keeping an eye on while this shouldn’t incite panic among those who enjoy online gambling. Thanks to a plank into the national platform that is republican the support of Las Vegas Sands Chairman and CEO Sheldon Adelson, the most vocal voices opposed to online gambling tend to come from the GOP. The majority that is new lead supporters of the Restoration of America’s Wire Act to try to advance the bill in Congress.

However, the odds of such a bill passing are still rather slim. Not everyone in the Republican Party is in favor of an online gambling ban, and also a lot of those being may not think the issue is well worth fighting over, as it really is hardly an important consideration on the list of average man or woman. While those and only a ban could probably court support that is enough democratic offset the losses inside their own party, that is far from specific, and the possibility of a split within the GOP regarding the issue could be enough to stop it from ever gaining any energy.

Massachusetts Casino Repeal Defeated Handily

In more local results, there have been two ballot initiatives of great interest to the gaming industry, one on each coast. On the East Coast, perhaps the gambling that is highest-profile of the year occurred in Massachusetts, where anti-casino activists were hoping to repeal a law that allowed for the certification and building of three resort gambling enterprises in the state, along side a slots parlor. As present polling suggested, the anti-casino forces came up well short, with 59 percent voting ‘No’ on the repeal.

Still, state officials acknowledged that the significant portion of the population that ended up being against their efforts had made their voices heard.

‘ We understand that approximately 41 percent voted in favor of the ballot effort [meaning for the repeal], and it’s also our job to keep to earn the confidence of all of the the people in Massachusetts proponents and opponents alike,’ said Steve Crosby, chairman of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission.

Meanwhile, voters in California rejected Proposition 48, a measure that will have allowed the North Fork Rancheria Band of Mono Indians to build a major casino about 40 miles far from their reservation. Had the proposition passed, opponents stated it could have set a precedent allowing tribes to build gaming facilities far beyond their lands.

‘This vote no puts the ball squarely in the state Legislature’s court: they now can make a policy that is consistent tribal gaming,’ said Cheryl Schmit, director of remain true for California, a group opposing the proposition.

Some gubernatorial races may also have an effect on the future of both land-based and gambling that is online different states. Perhaps most notably, the re-election of Florida governor Rick Scott in a tight competition over Democratic challenger Charlie Crist was seen as a bad sign for online gambling in the state, as Scott is a supporter of Adelson’s efforts to ban online gambling.

Chukchansi Gold Casino Tribal Leaders Turn Themselves In After Break-In

Tex McDonald, leader of the group that stormed the Chukchansi casino month that is last turns himself in. (Image:

Two council that is tribal faced with serious offenses relating to last month’s armed standoff at the Chukchansi Gold Resort and Casino near Coarsegold, California have turned themselves in. The casino was stormed by 20 armed men on October 9, the culmination of a strange power struggle between rival factions vying for control of the casino.

No arrests were made at the scene, as the siege happened on tribal land, but Madera County District Attorney Michael Keitz announced last Friday that 15 of the aggressors would be faced with serious felonies, including kidnapping, false imprisonment, attack having a firearm, assault with a life-threatening weapon, and battery inflicting serious injury.

The team’s leader, Tex McDonald, 64, and council that is fellow Vernon James King, 59, switched themselves in on Monday, used several hours later by two members of this security force that accompanied the group regarding the raid.

McDonald, whom has previous beliefs for assault having a weapon that is deadly making criminal threats, is charged with kidnapping, false imprisonment, assault by having a firearm, assault with a deadly weapon, battery causing severe injury, and assault with a stun gun, and his bail has been set at $1 million. The others face similar fees, with bail set at $800,000 for each.

Another protection guard was arrested Sunday, but at the time of writing, 10 people remain at large.

Disenrollment Controversy

The origin of the dispute among the Picayune Ranchera of Chukchansi Indians seems to relate to the practice that is controversial of,’ where a tribe strips certain members of their tribal status, therefore doubting them the associated advantages, in cases like this benefit from the casino.

Since 2003, hundreds of members were stripped of their tribal affiliations, including some of the last native speakers of the Chukchansi language. This led up to a election that is disputed 2012 and a schism inside the tribe between those that supported disenrollment and those bitterly opposed.

It seems the McDonald faction have been managing the casino from the base at a business that is nearby up until August, as soon as the rival faction, led by Reggie Lewis, a proponent of disenrollment and incumbent leader of the council after the disputed election, occupied the 10th and 11th floors for the casino within the early hours of the early morning, effortlessly taking it over.

Then in October, the Tribal Gaming Authority threatened to close the casino down and fine the tribe as much as $16 million, due to filing that is late of. This prompted the McDonald faction to work, in whatever they claim was an attempt to retrieve the audits and save the casino.

Criminal or Hero?

Also to some, despite the criminality of his tactics, McDonald is really a hero, a ‘patriot’ fighting for the good regarding the tribe. ‘My clients went in to recover papers so the casino would not turn off,’ stated his attorney, adding that the faction represented the ‘duly constituted council that is tribal. They just took steps to protect the tribe.’

Other people, however, don’t see quite the exact same tactics that are heroic the break-in.

‘Calling Tex McDonald a patriot is like calling a dictator democratically elected,’ said Richard Verri, representing the Lewis group. ‘ The justice that is criminal will determine whether or not the images caught on video of the illegal actions plus the violence he committed upon a casino employee had been legal or criminal.’

Whatever the truth associated with matter, McDonald now faces a ‘significant amount of time’ in state jail, in accordance with District Attorney Keitz. And meanwhile the casino remains shuttered by purchase of a federal judge, with the consequence of lost revenue becoming devastating to the community.

Laat een reactie achter

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *