Pennsylvania State Rep. John Payne has relocated their online poker bill to the home floor, and now his Gaming Oversight Committee is focusing its attention on daily fantasy sports.
The Pennsylvania House Gaming Oversight Committee has already voted in favor of moving an on-line poker bill to its chamber’s floor for continued conversation, and now the panel of lawmakers is looking for a measure that is sufficient regulate and permit daily fantasy sports (DFS).
Next Tuesday, the committee will convene for a general public hearing on fantasy activities at the Hollywood Casino at Penn nationwide Race Course, their state’s first of now 13 land-based gambling venues.
State Rep. George Dunbar’s (R-District 56) HB 1197 will be one item of consideration. In his legislation, DFS operators such as DraftKings and FanDuel could be required to partner with state-licensed casinos to use online sports contests.
First introduced last May, Dunbar’s legislation has taken a right back seat to State Rep. John Payne’s (R-District 106) Internet poker bill, which includes now been forwarded for deliberation by all of Pennsylvania’s 203 House Representatives.
That has cleared the way to tackle HB 1197 now. Dunbar’s idea certainly needs attention that is prompt as DFS continues to clog headlines in the news and gain traction among sports enthusiasts.
Regulate, Not Limit
Pennsylvania lawmakers appear tired of using the length of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman in simply outlawing the market that is emerging declaring the games illegal. Rather, officials in the Keystone State seem to help implementing the safeguards that are appropriate consumer protection.
‘I don’t know it down that we want to shut. It’s a big business. Many people are playing,’ State Rep. Kurt Masser (R-District 107) said.
Perhaps most surprising is the fact politicians in Harrisburg say they truly aren’t trying to regulate DFS for possible gain that is financial but to simply protect residents.
Pennsylvania is estimated to account for three percent regarding the national DFS market. With daily fantasy operators expected to collect $3.7 billion in competition entry fees in 2015, that means just $110 million being wagered in the state, revenues that will not also cause a ripple in the $30 billion budget.
DFS licenses would cost $50,000, with monthly revenues that are gross at five %.
‘ I wouldn’t depend on it to balance the budget,’ State Rep. Nick Kotik stated (D-District 45), certainly one of eight co-sponsors of HB 1197.
DFS Not Addicting
Council on Compulsive Gambling Executive Director Jim Pappas, (no reference to Poker Players Alliance Executive Director John Pappas), says fantasy recreations hasn’t led to increased statistics for problem gamblers in Pennsylvania.
Pappas says his office gets ‘spikes around occasions just like the Super Bowl and March Madness’ with callers reporting they have an addiction to betting, but ‘the numbers are not there yet’ to say whether fantasy sports will translate to more compulsive gaming habits.
To ensure that DFS remains an entertainment-first hobby, lawmakers in Massachusetts have proposed limiting deposits to $1,000 per month. The Bay State in addition has suggested limiting advanced players to contests that are certain providing novice games for first-time users.
Pennsylvania’s House Gaming users will pay attention to feedback from expert witnesses on those controls next week before deciding its next steps.
Massachusetts Casino Industry Becomes Local Cause for Concern
Plainridge Park Casino, Massachusetts’ first, has been forced to revise its profits projection for its first year of operation. (Image: bostonglobe.com)
Massachusetts’ casino experiment doesn’t appear to be going to plan that is according.
The packaging has barely been unwrapped regarding the state’s shiny, unique casino industry, but it is already causing anxiety into the press that is regional.
For a start, Plainridge Park, 1st casino to open in the state, has just posted its 3rd straight month of declining profits, and meanwhile MGM Resorts International has determined to lessen the size of its proposed resort in Springfield by 14 %, for reasons known only to itself.
Then, on the other side of the state, in Everett, Wynn Resorts is locked in a messy squabble that is legal the town of Boston, which seems determined to do everything it may to disrupt Steve Wynn’s ambitions.
This probably isn’t what the voting populace had in your mind when, in 2011, it opted to amend the constitution to allow casinos into its midst.
Some may have thought they were voting to save your self the legendary Suffolk Downs racecourse and by extension the thoroughbred industry that is racing Massachusetts.
Suffolk Downs could have been financially supported by Mohegan Sun had it won the bid for the license in the East, nonetheless it did not quite work out this way, as well as the racecourse that is historic forced to close down.
The licensing process itself had been fraught with discord.
Once Massachusetts had voted to legalize and control casino gaming within its boundaries, the bidding procedure began, during which casino giants squabbled with one other, often bitterly, as each vied for starters of the three licenses on offer.
Caesars Entertainment pulled out of the process early having spent $100 million on its campaign, and subsequently sued the Massachusetts Gambling Commission for exactly what it reported amounted to unsubstantiated accusations of links to crime that is organized.
And then there was the furor FBT that is surrounding Everett, the organization from which Wynn Resorts bought the plot of land that ended up being earmarked for the $1.3 billion development, and its concealment of the fact that one of its directors, Charles The Lightbody, was a convicted felon with alleged Mob links.
Wynn Resorts had been unaware of this, but it needs to have been enough to derail its licensing application under Massachusetts law, even though it wasn’t, and this particular fact is still being used being a beating that is legal by the City of Boston.
While Wynn struggles with restless natives, over in the south-east of hawaii MGM has found itself engaged a full-scale edge war with Connecticut.
The latter has relocated to protect its casino interests by amending its constitution to permit the establishment of a ‘satellite casino’ on its border that is northern miles from the proposed MGM task, to be run be by its two tribal operators, the Mohegan therefore the Mashantucket Pequots.
MGM had hoped to attract a large portion of its footfall from Connecticut and has filed case from the state, declaring its move to be unconstitutional.
Connecticut counters because it is actually forbidden from building a casino 50 miles from the Springfield project under Massachusetts gaming law, so it should really go and mind its own business that it isn’t, and that, furthermore, MGM is not being commercially discriminated against.
MGM swears that its decision to change the planned hotel that is 25-story with a six-story hotel and chop 14 percent from the overall development has absolutely nothing to do with all the forces gathering across the edge, however the Massachusettsian media is starting to wonder.
And meanwhile, while lawsuits fly, the main one casino who has actually opened, Plainridge Park, a slots-only operation, has been forced to downwardly revise its first-year projections.
So what you should do?
‘We can hope that the economy continues to enhance, boosting spending that is discretionary thus casino revenues, and that all of this intense competition will make the gambling enterprises give its clients a better gamble,’ penned the Lowell Sun. ‘But as many bettors will tell you, the chances don’t give a damn about hope.’
DDoS on the web Gambling Hacker Teen Told to Get a life that is real British Judge, Who Gives Him A chance to Have One
Judge Michael Stokes in Nottingham, UK told a 19-year-old DDoS attacker to ‘take up rugby or something’ him to probation as he sentenced. (Image: SWNS Group)
DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) attacks have plagued the gambling that is online, and online merchants in general, since the dawn of e-commerce.
These cyberattacks are devastating to business, crippling a web page’s operations by flooding thousands of simultaneous requests to its bandwidth, rendering it temporarily nonoperational. Often a ransom demand follows.
DDoS assaults directed at the online gambling industry tend be timed to coincide with big sporting events or battle meetings, or, into the instance of online poker, a huge online tournament festival.
Attackers are tough to trace, and prosecutions are incredibly unusual; in reality, in terms of we know just two DDoS online gambling attackers have actually ever been bought to test, and another of those happened this week.
But this was no shadowy Russian mafia outfit or ruthless gambling syndicate that is asian. Nope, it was a 19-year-old boy from Nottingham into the UK, whom lives together with his mother, needs to ‘get out more,’ based on the presiding judge, and who wept in the dock as he ended up being handed a 12-month suspended prison sentence.
‘Take up Rugby or something like that’
Max Whitehouse, 19, appeared in Nottingham Crown Court this week to plead bad to carrying out an unauthorized and reckless act with intent to impair computer operations, as well as control of prohibited weapons.
The court heard Whitehouse was 17 years old when he used their mother’s Twitter account to hold an online that is unnamed gambling hostage, costing the company an estimated £18,000 ($27,200) in the procedure.
When police visited their home, they found a stash of weapons, including eight knuckledusters, CS gas canisters, and a stun unit disguised as an iPhone, which Whitehouse had purchased online from China.
Judge Michael Stokes QC told the defendant that he had been ‘living a virtual life, not a real life,’ and that he should ‘take up rugby or something.’
‘ You need to get out more and live,’ he suggested.
Stokes accepted that Whitehouse was just a hoarder of tools who posed small threat to society and that his motivation to launch the attack ended up being ‘merely to see it. if he could do’
Delivering him to prison could be, said the judge, ‘highly damaging and retrograde.’
‘You were, during the relevant time, incredibly naive. I am pleased no intention was had by you whatsoever of selling or distributing any of these items [the weapons].
‘It was an offence of staggering naivety,’ he added.
The defendant ended up being ordered to pay £200 ($300) towards the costs associated with the prosecution, while his stash of weapons was forfeited.
Incidentally, the prosecution that is first-ever a DDoS on an online gambling cyberattack occurred when two Polish computer programmers attempted to ransom an on-line casino situated in Manchester, UK.
Somewhat unwisely, the duo decided to meet the director regarding the royal vegas online casino instant play company to talk about the terms of the offer and were promptly arrested by waiting for police.